Malaguti Drakon125 vs QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Compare Specifications of Malaguti Drakon125 and QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Selected Bikes

Malaguti Drakon125
Malaguti Drakon125

Brand:

Model:

QJ Motor QJ125-9H
QJ Motor QJ125-9H

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 1 cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled 4-Stroke,Single Cylinder,OHV 2V
Engine Starting Electric Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch -- Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition ECU CDI
Cooling System -- Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 13.4 PS @ 9500 RPM 10 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque 11.4 Nm @ 7500 RPM 8.5 NM @ 7500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 320 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 2
Transmission 6-speed manual transmission Chain
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Display Colour TFT display Classic Design with round meters
Frame -- Type : Cradle / Steel
Headlamp LED Round headlight
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 38 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 2.75-18
Rear 130/70-17 3.50-16
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2,75x17
Rear Rim: 3,50x17
--
Brakes
Front 300mm Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc Mechanical Drum
Rear 218mm hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front Upside-down shock absorber Telescopic
Rear Single shock absorber Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2000 mm
Width 810 mm 820 mm
Height 1100 mm 1090 mm
Kerb Weight -- 120
Wheelbase -- 1320 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres 12.0 litres
Overview
Features - Smart electronic fuel injection
- MAXXIS tyres
- Upside-down fork
- LED turn signals
- USB socket with dual output
- High-resolution color TFT display
Malaguti Drakon125
High-resolution color TFT display
- Single 2-step Seat provides a comfortable ride for the rider and passenger
- Tested and Improved Engine Components for tough using conditions
- Study frame design and low Fuel Consumption
Additional Details C02 Emission: 59 g/km --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8636