Mash Falcone 125 vs Yamaha R125

Compare Specifications of Mash Falcone 125 and Yamaha R125

Selected Bikes

Mash Falcone 125
Mash Falcone 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125
Yamaha R125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine Single cylinder , SOHC liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition Electronic TCI (digital)
Cooling System Air Cooled liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 11.6 HP @ 8750 RPM 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission -- Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Steel Deltabox
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 100/80 - 17 100/80-17 M/C
Rear 120/70 - 17 140/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front 300 mm disc, new 6 pistons brake caliper Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear 240 mm disc Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front -- Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear -- Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Black
Red
White
Icon Blue
Competition White
Tech Black


Physical Specs
Length 1985 mm 1955 mm
Width 745 mm 680 mm
Height 1075 mm 1065 mm
Weight -- 142 kg
Kerb Weight 131 --
Seat Height 780 825
Wheelbase -- 1355 mm
Ground Clearance -- 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - High-tech 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Compact Deltabox frame ensures lightweight handling
- Lightweight aluminum swingarm for high speed stability
- Sleek R-series body with dual twin-eye LED headlights
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Wide 140-section rear tire for supersport handling
- Supersport specification braking system
Additional Details Front fork : hydraulic inverted Ø 37 mm Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel :130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1886