Mash Falcone 125 vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Mash Falcone 125 vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Compare Specifications of Mash Falcone 125 and Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Selected Bikes

Mash Falcone 125 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	124.00 cc	124.70 cc
Engine	Single cylinder , SOHC	liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting	Electric	Electric
Engine Lubrication	--	Wet sump
Clutch	--	Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System	--	Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition	Electronic	TCI (digital)
Cooling System	Air Cooled	liquid-cooled
Maximum Power	11.6 HP @ 8750 RPM	15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque	--	11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission	--	Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern	--	1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame	--	Steel Deltabox
Headlamp	--	LED

Tyres

Front	100/80 - 17	100/80-17 M/C
Rear	120/70 - 17	130/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM	Spoke	Alloy

Brakes

Front	300 mm disc, new 6 pistons brake caliper	Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear	240 mm disc	Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm

Suspension

Front	--	Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear	--	Swingarm, (Link type suspension)

Colors Available

Colors

Black Red White

Monster Black

Physical Specs

Length	1985 mm	1990 mm
Width	745 mm	755 mm
Height	1075 mm	1140 mm
Weight	--	142 kg
Kerb Weight	131	--
Seat Height	780	825
Wheelbase	--	1325 mm
Ground Clearance	--	155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	13.5 litres	11.5 litres

Overview

Features	--	- R-Series body with Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP livery - YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit - 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation - Aluminium swing arm for high speed stability - Light and precise Assist & Slipper clutch - Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments - Powerful braking system - Wide rear tyre for sharp road holding and style
Additional Details	Front fork : hydraulic inverted Ø 37 mm	Final transmission : Chain Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km CO2 emission : 49g/km Caster angle : 25º Trail : 89mm Front travel : 130 mm Rear travel : 114 mm Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5779