Metisse Hammer Mk3 vs Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Compare Specifications of Metisse Hammer Mk3 and Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Selected Bikes

Metisse Hammer Mk3
Metisse Hammer Mk3

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XSR700
Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 650.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine Fully reconditioned original 650 cc T6 Triumph Liquid-cooled DOHC inline twin cylinder; 8 valves
Fuel System Carburettor: Amal single concentric carburettor type R930/23 Fuel injection
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission Reconditioned original Triumph 4 speed Constant mesh 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Frame Brazed 4130 chrome moly tubular frame nickel plated --
Handle Bar Braced chrome handlebars --
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Mitas 2.75 x 21" 120/70ZR17 Michelin Road 5
Rear Mitas 4.5 x 18" 180/55ZR17 Michelin Road 5
Wheel / RIM Front : Chrome 21" wire spoke
Rear : Chrome 18" wire spoke
--
Brakes
Front 7" Triumph front brake drum Dual hydraulic disc, 282mm; ABS
Rear 7" BSA drum brake Hydraulic disc, 245mm; ABS
Suspension
Front 35 mm Ceriani forks with Ceriani yokes 41mm telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear Twin Girling reproduction dampers & springs Single shock, adjustable preload; 5.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Raven


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm 2075 mm
Width 900 mm 820 mm
Height 1150 mm 1130 mm
Weight 135 kg --
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1404 mm
Ground Clearance -- 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features Body Panels: 5 piece GRP body panel set in battleship grey gel coat.
Fuel tank: 8 litre GRP fuel tank in Battleship grey with epoxy resin internal coating
Ancillary Items: Chromed headlamp
Branding: Metisse Hammer fuel tank logo
--
Additional Details Seating option: Dual seat option with matching pillion footpegs
Swing arm: Brazed 4130 chrome moly tubular swing arm nickel plated
Exhaust: Twin up-swept chrome pipes with bandaged heat shields
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 3.5 in
Fuel Economy: 58 mpg
Wet Weight: 410 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

393