Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary vs Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS

Compare Specifications of Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary and Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS

Selected Bikes

Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary
Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS
Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 853.00 cc 999.80 cc
Engine Transversal 90° V-twin, two valves per cylinder 4-CYLINDER, 4-STROKE, LIQUID-COOLED, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 64.9 PS @ 6800 RPM (Also available at 35 kW, A2 driver license) 202 PS @13200 rpm
Maximum Torque 73 NM @ 5000 RPM 117.6 Nm @10800 rpm
Transmission 6 speed 6-SPEED CONSTANT MESH WITH SLIPPER CLUTCH
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display Display TFT --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 18" 100/90 --
Rear 17" 150/70 --
Wheel / RIM Lightweight alloy, 1 Cast aluminium wheels
Brakes
Front Stainless steel floating disk Ø 320 mm, Brembo caliper with 4 differentiated and opposed pistons. 320MM T-DRIVE DISCS, BREMBO RADIAL-MOUNT MONOBLOC CALIPERS
Rear Stainless steel disk Ø 260 mm, floating 2 pistons caliper. 220MM DISC, NISSIN SINGLE-PISTON CALIPER
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic fork Ø 40 mm 43 MM SHOWA BIG PISTON FRONT (BPF) FORKS
Rear Swingarm Twin-sided with two spring preload adjustable shock absorbers SHOWA REAR SHOCK - LINK TYPE, COIL SPRING, OIL DAMPED
Colors Available
Colors Nero Ruvido
Centenario
Arancione Rame
Azzurro Ghiaccio.
METALLIC MAT BLACK NO.2 , METALLIC TRITON BLUE, PEARL MIRA RED


Physical Specs
Length -- 2075 mm
Width -- 705 mm
Height -- 1145 mm
Weight 198 kg 202 kg
Kerb Weight 218 --
Seat Height 780 --
Wheelbase -- 1420 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 21 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - Full LED lights package with DRL
- LCD dashboard
- MGCT Moto Guzzi
- Controllo di Trazione
- Standard double channel ABS.
--
Additional Details Compliance Meets : European Directive Euro 5
Emissions : 119 g/km (CO2)
Consumption : 4,9 l/100 km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7380