Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary vs Yamaha YZF-R1

Compare Specifications of Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary and Yamaha YZF-R1

Selected Bikes

Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary
Moto Guzzi V7 Stone Centenary

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha YZF-R1
Yamaha YZF-R1

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 853.00 cc 998.00 cc
Engine Transversal 90° V-twin, two valves per cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, forward-inclined parallel 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 64.9 PS @ 6800 RPM (Also available at 35 kW, A2 driver license) --
Maximum Torque 73 NM @ 5000 RPM --
Transmission 6 speed Constant mesh 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display Display TFT --
Frame -- Aluminium Deltabox
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 18" 100/90 120/70 ZR17MC (58W) Tubeless
Rear 17" 150/70 190/55 ZR17M/C (75W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Lightweight alloy, 1 Alloy
Brakes
Front Stainless steel floating disk Ø 320 mm, Brembo caliper with 4 differentiated and opposed pistons. Hydraulic dual discs, 320 mm - ABS
Rear Stainless steel disk Ø 260 mm, floating 2 pistons caliper. Hydraulic single disc, 220 mm - ABS
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic fork Ø 40 mm Telescopic forks, 120mm travel
Rear Swingarm Twin-sided with two spring preload adjustable shock absorbers Swingarm (link suspension), 120mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Nero Ruvido
Centenario
Arancione Rame
Azzurro Ghiaccio.
--


Physical Specs
Length -- 2055 mm
Width -- 690 mm
Height -- 1150 mm
Weight 198 kg 199 kg
Kerb Weight 218 --
Seat Height 780 --
Wheelbase -- 1405 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 21 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features - Full LED lights package with DRL
- LCD dashboard
- MGCT Moto Guzzi
- Controllo di Trazione
- Standard double channel ABS.
--
Additional Details Compliance Meets : European Directive Euro 5
Emissions : 119 g/km (CO2)
Consumption : 4,9 l/100 km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3729