Moto Guzzi V85 TT Adventure vs Yamaha XSR900

Compare Specifications of Moto Guzzi V85 TT Adventure and Yamaha XSR900

Selected Bikes

Moto Guzzi V85 TT Adventure
Moto Guzzi V85 TT Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XSR900
Yamaha XSR900

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 853.00 cc 847.00 cc
Engine Transversal 90° V-twin, two valves per cylinder (titanium intake) Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, 3-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 75 PS @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 81 NM @ 5000 RPM --
Transmission 6 speed Constant mesh 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display LCD dashboard --
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 19” 110/80 120/70 ZR17M/C(58W) Tubeless
Rear 17” 150/70 180/55 ZR17M/C (73W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Cross spoked tubless wheel Alloy
Brakes
Front Double stainless steel floating disk 320mm, radial Brembo calipers with 4 opposed pistons Hydraulic dual discs
Rear Stainless steel disk 260mm, floating 2 piston caliper Hydraulic single disc
Suspension
Front Upside-down hydraulic tlescopic fork 41mm, with adjustable extension and spring preload Telescopic forks
Rear Swingarm Twin-sided with lateral mono shock absorber, adjustable extension and spring preload Swingarm (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors GIALLO MOJAVE
BLU UYUNI
--


Physical Specs
Length -- 2075 mm
Width -- 815 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight -- 195 kg
Kerb Weight 208 --
Seat Height 828 --
Wheelbase -- 1440 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 23 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features - Full LED lights package with DRL
- LCD dashboard
- MGCT Moto Guzzi
- Traction Control
- Standard double channel ABS
- Aluminum top box and side cases

Moto Guzzi V85 Tt Adventure
LED Headlamp

Moto Guzzi V85 Tt Adventure
Taillamp
--
Additional Details Compliance Meets : European Directive Euro 5.
CO2 Emissions : 119 g/km (CO2)
Consumption : 48 mpg
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4297