Moto Guzzi V85 TT Travel 850 vs Sol Invictus Apollo Cafe Racer

Compare Specifications of Moto Guzzi V85 TT Travel 850 and Sol Invictus Apollo Cafe Racer

Selected Bikes

Moto Guzzi V85 TT Travel 850
Moto Guzzi V85 TT Travel 850

Brand:

Model:

Sol Invictus Apollo Cafe Racer
Sol Invictus Apollo Cafe Racer

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 850.00 cc --
Engine Transversal 90° V-twin, two valves per cylinder (titanium intake) Single Cylinder 4 Stroke 400
Engine Starting Electric Electric Start
Fuel System -- Delphi EFI System
Maximum Power 76 HP @ 7500 RPM 28 Ps @ 7500 Rpm
Maximum Torque 82 NM @ 5000 RPM 30 Nm @ 5500 Rpm
Transmission 6 Speed 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Display Display TFT --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 19" 110/80 3:25 - 18”
Rear 17" 150/70 130/80 - 18”
Wheel / RIM Cross spoked tubeless wheel --
Brakes
Front Double stainless steel floating disk Ø 320 mm, radial Brembo calipers with 4 opposed pistons ABS Hydraulic Brake System
Rear Stainless steel disk Ø 260 mm, floating 2 pistons caliper ABS Hydraulic Brake System
Suspension
Front Upside-down hydraulic telescopic fork Ø 41 mm, with adjustable extension and spring preload --
Rear Swingarm Twin-sided with lateral mono shock absorber, adjustable extension and spring preload. --
Colors Available
Colors Sabbia Namib. --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2130 mm
Height -- 1200 mm
Weight 243 kg --
Kerb Weight 211 --
Seat Height 830 800
Wheelbase -- 1600 mm
Ground Clearance -- 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 23 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features - A Higher Touring windshield
- Additional LED fog lights
- 5 Riding Mode (Street, Rain, Offroad, Sport, Custom)
- Cruise Control
- Handguard
- Aluminium sump guard
- MGCT
- Moto Guzzi Controllo di Trazione
- Standard double channel ABS
- Dedicated Side panniers
- Heated grips
- Touring windshield
- Moto Guzzi MIA
- LED fog lamps + installation kit
--
Additional Details Compliance Meets : European Directive Euro 5
Emissions : 119 g/km (CO2)
Consumption : 4,9 l/100 km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1834