Motomel Max 110 vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Compare Specifications of Motomel Max 110 and Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Selected Bikes

Motomel Max 110
Motomel Max 110

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition
Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 108.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine 4T single cylinder liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric and kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI (digital)
Cooling System Air Cooled liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 4.8 PS at 8000 RPM / 7.1 PS at 8500 RPM 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 150 kg --
Transmission 4 speeds Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 60 kmph --
Display LCD Display --
Frame -- Steel Deltabox
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 3,50 x 10 100/80-17 M/C
Rear 3,50 x 10 130/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear Drum brake Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front Hydraulic fork. Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear Hydraulic shock absorbers Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors BLUE
BLACK
RED
WHITE
Monster Black


Physical Specs
Length 1540 mm 1990 mm
Width 730 mm 755 mm
Height 990 mm 1140 mm
Weight 88 kg 142 kg
Seat Height -- 825
Wheelbase -- 1325 mm
Ground Clearance -- 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 3.8 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - R-Series body with Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP livery
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Aluminium swing arm for high speed stability
- Light and precise Assist & Slipper clutch
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Powerful braking system
- Wide rear tyre for sharp road holding and style
Additional Details Consumption: 2.1 Lts / 100km Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel : 130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6698