MyWay Lupus-EEC vs Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Compare Specifications of MyWay Lupus-EEC and Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Selected Bikes

MyWay Lupus-EEC
MyWay Lupus-EEC

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 125 2022
Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 3000 W Brushless DC Motor --
Range 55 km --
Charging Time 6-8 Hours --
Engine Displacement -- 125.00 cc
Engine -- 4-stroke;Liquid-cooled;SOHC;Single cylinder;4-valves;EURO5
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Maximum Power -- 12 PS @ @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Transmission -- V-Belt Automatic
Top Speed 45 kmph --
Battery Weight : 42 kg
Lead-acid Battery
Battery life : 500 charging cycles
--
Display -- LCD Display
Frame Steel --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 250-17,2.75-17 90/80-14M/C 43P Tubeless
Rear 250-17,2.75-17 130/70-13M/C 63P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Two Hydraulic disc brakes
Rear Drum Hydraulic single disc brake
Suspension
Front -- Front suspension system : Telescopic forks
Front travel : 90 mm
Rear -- Rear suspension system Unit Swing
Rear travel : 90 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Matt Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm 1995 mm
Width 700 mm 750 mm
Height 1150 mm 1215 mm
Weight 65 kg 168 kg
Seat Height -- 785
Wheelbase 1200 mm 1410 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 7.2 litres
Overview
Features - LED heaglights
- Cruise control
- New EURO5 Blue Core 125cc engine
- Optimised three-wheel layout
- New chassis for increased comfort
- Start & Stop engine technology
- Newly developed twin shock rear suspension
- Front and rear disc brakes with optimised UBS
- New LCD instruments with smartphone connectivity
- New Smart Key keyless operation
- Larger footboard area
- LED headlight with broader beam
- Underseat storage and front pocket
Additional Details Climbing capacity : 18°
Controller : 15 mosfets
Meter Type : Mechanical
Shock Absorber(Front/Rear) : Hydraulic / Hydraulic
Fuel consumption : 2.3 L/100 km
CO2 emission : 54 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

335