Peugeot eT01 Belt Mixt PowerTube vs Univega Vision S 3.5

Compare Specifications of Peugeot eT01 Belt Mixt PowerTube and Univega Vision S 3.5

Selected Bikes

Peugeot eT01 Belt Mixt PowerTube
Peugeot eT01 Belt Mixt PowerTube

Brand:

Model:

Univega Vision S 3.5
Univega Vision S 3.5

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor BOSCH ACTIVE LINE PLUS --
Range 130 KM PER CHARGE 75 km
Load Carrying Capacity -- 120 Kg
Battery 500 WH BATTERY --
Charger 4A (100-240V) Shimano, 3 ampere
Display BOSCH DISPLAY INTUVIA --
Frame AL 6061 T6 HYDROFORMED, BELT COMPATIBLE Shimano MTB integrated, Aluminium
Stem ALUMINIUM 90 X 31.8 ADJUSTABLE 0-90° Concept
Handle Bar ALUMINIUM 630 X 31.8 X 79 X 41° Concept Flat
Fork SUNTOUR NCX, 63 MM, POSTMOUNT Rock Shox Recon Gold RL
Seatpost TEC OBVIUS 27.2 X 350 MM Kind Shock E30I Drop, 125 mm, with Remote
Crankset GATES, 170MM, 50T, FOR BELT Shimano Steps
Pedals -- Sport, with reflector
Chain -- Shimano CN-HG54
Shifters NUVINCI CABLE ENVOLIO --
Gear -- Ratio: front: 34, rear: 11-42
Saddle ROYAL ESSENZA Ergon SM10
Hub Front ALUMINIUM 36T / NUVINCI ENVIOLO 36T, DISC Novatec D162 Disc, 12x148 mm
Hub Rear ALUMINIUM 36T / NUVINCI ENVIOLO 36T, DISC --
Cassette GATES 24T --
Sprocket -- Shimano HG500
Tyres
Front MICHELIN PROTEK URBAN 700 X 38C Maxxis Minion DHF, 66-584
Rear MICHELIN PROTEK URBAN 700 X 38C Maxxis Minion DHF, 66-584
Wheel / RIM -- Rims:RaceFace AR40 Offset
Brakes
Front 180 MM MAGURA MT2 HYDRAULIC Shimano MT400, hydraulic disc brake
Rear 160 MM MAGURA MT2 HYDRAULIC Shimano MT400, hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors MAGNETIC GREY Magic black/Laguna blue matt


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 25.25 kg --
Overview
Features - PEDAL ASSIST
- DUAL DISC BRAKES
- USB CHARGING
- ALUMINIUM FRAME
- LUGGAGE RACK
--
Additional Details SIZE : 43-48 (S-M) Size: S, M, L, XL
Shifting System: Shimano Deore, 10-speed
Switch Lever: Shimano SLX
Accessories STAND : ATRAN DUX 40 MM --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7827