Piaggio MP3 300 HPE Sport vs Yamaha Tricity 300

Compare Specifications of Piaggio MP3 300 HPE Sport and Yamaha Tricity 300

Selected Bikes

Piaggio MP3 300 HPE Sport
Piaggio MP3 300 HPE Sport

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 300
Yamaha Tricity 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 278.00 cc 292.00 cc
Engine Piaggio HPE single-cylinder 4 stroke Single cylinder, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Wet sump
Clutch Automatic, centrifugal dry clutch --
Fuel System Electronic injection Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 26,2 HP @ 7750 RPM 27.6 PS @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque 26 NM @ 6500 RPM 29.0 NM @ 5750 RPM
Transmission CVT with torque server V-Belt Automatic
Tyres
Front Tubeless 110/70-13” 120/70-14M/C 55P Tubeless
Rear Tubeless 140/70-14'' 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Two 258 mm discs Hydraulic disc brake, Ø267 mm
Rear Disc Ø 240 mm Hydraulic single disc brake, Ø267 mm
Suspension
Front Articulated quadrilateral - Nominal axial stroke: 95 mm. Electro-hydraulic suspension blocking system. Double telescopic fork
Rear Dual hydraulic shock absorber with pre-adjusted spring in one of 4 positions – Nominal axial stroke: 122 mm Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Grigio Materia
Bianco Luna
Nero Meteora
Nimbus Grey
Tech Kamo
Gunmetal Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm 2250 mm
Width 800 mm 815 mm
Height -- 1470 mm
Weight -- 239 kg
Seat Height 780 795
Wheelbase 1450 mm 1595 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features -- - 3-wheel Urban Mobility with Tricity DNA
- Economical and powerful 300cc BLUE CORE engine
- Standing Assist System
- Lightest in class / Autonomy
- Large storage space
- LCD instruments and high-quality finish
- Large diameter disc brakes
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 3.3 l / 100 km
CO2 emission : 77g / km
Front travel : 100 mm
Rear travel : 84 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2532