Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H vs Yamaha 2022 TW200

Compare Specifications of Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H and Yamaha 2022 TW200

Selected Bikes

Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H
Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TW200
Yamaha 2022 TW200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 197.00 cc 196.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , OHV 2V Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke; 2 valves
Engine Starting Kick/Electric Electric Start
Engine Lubrication Forced and Splash --
Clutch Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch --
Fuel System Carburetor Mikuni 28mm
Ignition CDI CDI
Cooling System Oil-Cooled --
Maximum Power 12.7 HP @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 13.5 HP @ 600 RPM --
Transmission Chain Constant-mesh 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern N-1-2-3-4-5-N --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Display -- Speedometer
Odometer
Trip meter
Indicator lights
Frame Cradle / Steel --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90- 17 Tubeless 130/80-18
Rear 130/90- 15 Tubeless 180/80-14
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disk 280 mm Single disc, 220mm
Rear Hydraulic Disk 240 mm Drum, 110mm
Suspension
Front 120 mm Telescopic Telescopic fork; 6.3-in travel
Rear 53 mm Unit Swing Single shock; 5.9-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Red
Blue
Green
Black
Grey and Black


Physical Specs
Length 2120 mm 2090 mm
Width 800 mm 820 mm
Height 1060 mm 1120 mm
Weight 2 kg --
Kerb Weight 156 --
Seat Height 700 789
Wheelbase 1420 mm 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 264 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.8 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features Lightweight and Compact Design make the daily city riding more comfortable and enjoyable Low Seat Height
Torquey Powerplant
Smooth, Counterbalanced Engine
Digital Ignition
Low Maintenance Engine
Lightweight Swingarm
Comfortable Saddle
Protective Fenders
Passenger-Ready
Bright Illumination
Dual Sport Lighting
Fork Protection
Modern Battery
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 25.8°
Trail: 3.4 in
Fuel Economy: 78 mpg
Wet Weight: 278 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8987