Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H vs YCF 2019 Bigy Factory Daytona 190 MX

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H vs YCF 2019 Bigy Factory Daytona 190 MX

Compare Specifications of Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H and YCF 2019 Bigy Factory Daytona 190 MX

Selected Bikes

Qianjiang QJ125(200)-2H Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

YCF 2019 Bigy Factory Daytona 190 MX Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	197.00 cc	187.20 cc
Engine	4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , OHV 2V	4-stroke, Aircooled, 4 valve, 1- cylinder
Engine Starting	Kick/Electric	Kick Start
Engine Lubrication	Forced and Splash	Wet sump
Clutch	Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch	Multiplate wet
Fuel System	Carburetor	Keihin PE28 with Air Box
Ignition	CDI	CDI
Cooling System	Oil-Cooled	Air Cooled
Maximum Power	12.7 HP @ 7500 RPM	--
Maximum Torque	13.5 HP @ 600 RPM	--
Transmission	Chain	5 gears
Gear Shift Pattern	N-1-2-3-4-5-N	1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery	--	12V / 3 Ah
Frame	Cradle / Steel	High tensile steel; Tubular
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Tyres

Front	90/90- 17 Tubeless	70/100-17" Knobby ARRO
Rear	130/90- 15 Tubeless	90/100-14" Knobby ARRO
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Hydraulic Disk 280 mm	220 mm Single disc; Hydraulic
Rear	Hydraulic Disk 240 mm	200 mm Single disc; Hydraulic

Suspension

Front	120 mm Telescopic	37 mm ENGI fork, 800 mm, Adjustable Rebound & Preload
Rear	53 mm Unit Swing	355 mm Mono ENGI Shock absorber, adjustable preload & rebound damping

Colors Available

Colors

Red Blue Green Black

White/Purple

Physical Specs

Length	2120 mm	1880 mm
Width	800 mm	780 mm
Height	1060 mm	1135 mm
Weight	2 kg	84.2 kg
Kerb Weight	156	--
Seat Height	700	--
Wheelbase	1420 mm	1305 mm
Ground Clearance	170 mm	325 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	11.8 litres	5.8 litres

Overview

Features

Lightweight and Compact Design make the daily city riding more comfortable and enjoyable

--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

9168