Qianjiang QJ150-27E vs Yamaha Force 2.0

Compare Specifications of Qianjiang QJ150-27E and Yamaha Force 2.0

Selected Bikes

Qianjiang QJ150-27E
Qianjiang QJ150-27E

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Force 2.0
Yamaha Force 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.30 cc 155.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , SOHC Water-cooled four-stroke single cylinder 4V
Engine Starting Kick/Electric --
Engine Lubrication Forced/Splash --
Clutch Dry Centrifugal --
Fuel System EFI --
Ignition TCI --
Cooling System Air-Cooled --
Maximum Power 13 HP @ 8500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 13.4 NM @ 5000 RPM --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission Belt --
Gear Shift Pattern CVT --
Display LCD Display LCD Display
Frame Underbone/Steel --
Headlamp LED Halogen bulb/ 55W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/90-12 Tubeless 120 / 70-13 M / C 53P
Rear 110/90-12 Tubeless 130 / 70-13 M / C 57P
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disk 267 mm / one-way double-piston caliper Disc brake
Rear Hydraulic Disk 230 mm / one-way double-piston caliper Disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic/90 Upright fork
Rear Unit Swing/72 Preload adjustable double rear shock
Colors Available
Colors Black
Red
White
Blue
Night Titanium Black
Meteorite Ash (Extinction)
Cold and white
Sandstorm Green (Extinction)


Physical Specs
Length 1900 mm 1895 mm
Width 710 mm 760 mm
Height 1100 mm 1120 mm
Weight -- 130 kg
Kerb Weight 115 --
Seat Height 760 815
Wheelbase 1308 mm 1340 mm
Ground Clearance 125 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 6 litres --
Overview
Features - Neo Classic Design with Newly-Developed Liquid-Cooled and Idle-Stop Engine Smart Keyless Ignition System with Answer-Back Feature.
- Convenient Front Pocket with USB Charger and Front Luggage Hook Roomy Under-Seat Compartment for a 3/4 Face Helmet .
- Full LED Lighting
- LCD Meter
- Side Stand Cut-Off
- Retractable Rear Step Bar Efficient and Safe Dual-Chanel ABS Disc Brake System.
VVA
SMG
TCS
Additional Details -- Energy efficiency rating Level 1: (over 150c.c.~250c.c.)
Annual fuel consumption (liter): 100
Test value (average fuel consumption) : 44.9 (km/liter)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8599