QJ Motor SRK600 RR (QJ600GS-3D) vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7

Compare Specifications of QJ Motor SRK600 RR (QJ600GS-3D) and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7

Selected Bikes

QJ Motor SRK600 RR (QJ600GS-3D)
QJ Motor SRK600 RR (QJ600GS-3D)

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 600.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine 4 - Cylinder Inline , 16V DOHC Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Manual ,mutilate Wet Clutch(ASC) --
Fuel System EFI Fuel injection
Cooling System Liquid - Cooled Liquid-cooled,
Maximum Power 80 HP @ 11000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 51 NM @ 10500 RPM --
Transmission 6 Gears, Chain 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch; with Assist & Slipper clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22F E
Rear 180/55ZR17 180/55ZR17 Bridgestone BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22R E
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disc 320 mm(double)(ABS) 298 mm hydraulic disc
Rear Hydraulic Disc 260 mm(ABS) 245 mm hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Upside-Down Telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel, adjustable for preload, rebound and compression
Rear Telescopic coil spring oil damped Linked-type Monocross shock, adjustable preload and rebound; 5.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Team Yamaha Blue
Performance Black -


Physical Specs
Length 2140 mm 2070.1 mm
Width 750 mm 706 mm
Height 1150 mm 1160 mm
Weight -- 187 kg
Kerb Weight 225 --
Seat Height 800 --
Wheelbase 1460 mm 1394 mm
Ground Clearance 140 mm 134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.4 litres 12 litres
Overview
Features - Assist and slipper clutch and mono-directional quick shifter + Clip-on Handlebar + backlit switch assembly
- High tensile steel trellis frame with Magnesium Aluminum Alloy swingarm
- KYB Suspension Front upside-down fork / Rear adjustable mono shock
- Brembo calipers Front (double disc, radial master cylinder) and Rear + Bosch dual channel ABS
--
Additional Details -- Final Drive : Chain
Fuel Economy : 58 MPG

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6642