Raleigh Merit 1 vs Trinx N600

Compare Specifications of Raleigh Merit 1 and Trinx N600

Selected Bikes

Raleigh Merit 1
Raleigh Merit 1

Brand:

Model:

Trinx N600
Trinx N600

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Custom Formed and Butted AL-6061 Heat Treated Aluminum 700c Endurance Road Geometry Trinx Alloy 26"x 15.5"
Stem Kalloy SA-DB2 Alloy 7 Deg. 31.8 mm Bore Trinx Alloy
Handle Bar Kalloy HB-CR21 Road Bend, 31.8 mm Trinx Alloy Small Rise
Fork Alloy 1-1/8" Road Alloy Mechanical Lock-Out Suspension , Travel : 100 mm
Seats Raleigh Road with Steel Rails --
Seatpost Kalloy SP-375 Micro Adjust Alloy, 27.2 x 350 mm Trinx Alloy
Crankset FSA Tempo Compact Alloy Arm with 34/50 Cho-moly Chainrings --
Pedals FPD NW-366 --
Chain KMC Z8.1 KMC 8S
Shifters Shimano R2000 Claris 2x8 Shifter / Brake Lever Shimano SL-EF505
Saddle -- Trinx Comfort
Headset Integrated Threaded 1-1/8" --
Derailleur Front Shimano R2000 Claris Shimano FD-TY500
Derailleur Rear Shimano R2000 Claris Shimano RD-TY300
Hub Front JoyTech F362TSE Alloy Road 28-Hole Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Hub Rear JoyTech A171DSE Alloy Road 28-Hole Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Spoke 14g Stainless Steel --
Cassette -- CS-M3008 8S , 11-32T
Chainrings -- Prowheel 24/34/40T x 170L
Tyres
Front Kenda K-193 Road 700 x 28c Wire Bead CST 26"x 1.95" 27TPI
Rear Kenda K-193 Road 700 x 28c Wire Bead CST 26"x 1.95" 27TPI
Wheel / RIM Alex AT505 Double Wall Alloy 28 Hole, Tubeless Compatible Rim :Trinx Alloy Double Wall
Brakes
Front Tektro Alloy Dual Pivot Calipers Trinx Alloy Mechanical Disc
Rear Tektro Alloy Dual Pivot Calipers Trinx Alloy Mechanical Disc
Brake Lever Shimano R2000 Claris Shifter / Brake Lever --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black Dark/Pink White
Cyan/Orange White
Pink/Red White
White/Pink Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Bottom Bracket : Sealed Cartridge Bearing
Cogset : Shimano HG31 8-Speed (11-32)
Extras : Rack and Fender Mounts
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9306