Ribble HT 725 - Enthusiast SRAM NX Eagle vs Sensa Treviso N-7 Gent

Compare Specifications of Ribble HT 725 - Enthusiast SRAM NX Eagle and Sensa Treviso N-7 Gent

Selected Bikes

Ribble HT 725 - Enthusiast SRAM NX Eagle
Ribble HT 725 - Enthusiast SRAM NX Eagle

Brand:

Model:

Sensa Treviso N-7 Gent
Sensa Treviso N-7 Gent

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Reynolds 725 Steel, Triple-Butted Lite aluminium 6061 - 2x butted - Tapered 1.5
Stem LEVEL XI 6061 3D-Forged, 35 x 50 mm Uno Alloy - Adjustable
Handle Bar -- Uno Alloy
Fork RockShox 35 Gold RL, 150 mm Supra superlite alloy - Tapered 1.5
Seatpost LEVEL 150 mm Dropper Post with Remote Supra Base Line
Grip LEVEL Lock-On, Black --
Chain SRAM NX Eagle, Silver --
Shifters SRAM NX Eagle 12-Speed --
Saddle WTB Koda Race Cromoly, 142 mm Black Selle Royal Freeway
Headset LEVEL 44, Available in a choice of colours in BikeBuilder --
Derailleur Rear SRAM NX Eagle Long Cage --
Hub Front -- Shimano Nexus-7
Hub Rear -- Shimano DH-C6000
Cassette SRAM PG-1230 Eagle 11-50T --
Bottom Bracket SRAM DUB Threaded BSA 73 mm --
Tyres
Front Maxxis Minion DHF/DHR II, 27.5 x 2.6", Black Schwalbe Road Cruiser 37-622 - Green compound
Rear Maxxis Minion DHF/DHR II, 27.5 x 2.6", Black Schwalbe Road Cruiser 37-622 - Green compound
Wheel / RIM LEVEL 35 Alloy Disc 650B TR, 15x110F/12x148R Ryde X-plorer
Brakes
Front SRAM Level T Direct Mount Hydraulic Shimano Nexus-7 - Shimano rollerbrakes
Rear SRAM Level T Direct Mount Hydraulic Shimano Nexus-7 - Shimano rollerbrakes
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Grey Matt Charcoal Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 16.6 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Chainset : SRAM NX Eagle DUB, 32T, 170 mm
Rotors : SRAM Centreline 6-Bolt 180/160
Bars : LEVEL XI - 6061DB 35 x 800 mm - 9° Backsweep, 5° Upsweep
Frame Protection : Ribble Frame Protection Kit, Clear
Lights : Shimano hub dynamo - AXA Blueline30 + AXA Spark
Lock : AXA Defender RL
Sizes : 51-56-61cm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3993