Scorpa 125 TY Long Ride vs SWM Ace of Space 125

Compare Specifications of Scorpa 125 TY Long Ride and SWM Ace of Space 125

Selected Bikes

Scorpa 125 TY Long Ride
Scorpa 125 TY Long Ride

Brand:

Model:

SWM Ace of Space 125
SWM Ace of Space 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 123.70 cc 124.70 cc
Engine 4 stroke Single cylinder, 4 stroke; DOHC, 4 valve; 6 Speed gears; Euro 5
Engine Starting Kick / Electric starter Electric and Kick
Clutch Multi-disc in an oil bath --
Ignition Electronic CDI --
Cooling System Air cooling --
Maximum Power -- 11 kw
Transmission 5 speed sequential gearbox with security selector system. Primary gear drive chain secondary drive 6 Speed gears
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Tyres
Front -- 120 / 70R / 17 Rosso II
Rear -- 150 / 60R / 17 Rosso II
Wheel / RIM Front wheel : 1,60“ x 21“
Rear wheel : 2,15“ x 18“
Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulically activated, floating mount 185 mm (7.28 in) Braktec 4 piston caliper Fixed disc with hydraulic control and floating caliper with ABS; Disc Ø 300mm
Rear Hydraulically activated, floating mount 185 mm (7.28 in) Braktec 4 piston caliper Fixed disc with hydraulic control and floating caliper with ABS; Disc Ø 220mm
Suspension
Front 40mm hydraulic steel fork 170mm travel Upside down telescopic hydraulic fork; Fork legs Ø 41mm
Rear Hydraulic mono shock with 165 mm travel Double hydraulic shock absorber with spring preload adjustment
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 85 kg 130 kg
Seat Height 840 720
Wheelbase 1308 mm --
Ground Clearance 320 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 4.2 litres --
Overview
Features - New 2021 graphics kit with Long Ride specific decals
- Electric + Kick Starter
- 185 mm disc brakes with BRAKTEC 4 piston caliper
- 170 mm steel fork
- 165 mm mono-shock absorber
- Fuel tank size doubled with a 4.2-L polyamide tank
--
Additional Details Fuel : Unleaded gasoline 98 Octane
Chassis : Tubular section Chrome-moly
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7215