Sherco 300 ST-R vs Yamaha 2022 XT250

Compare Specifications of Sherco 300 ST-R and Yamaha 2022 XT250

Selected Bikes

Sherco 300 ST-R
Sherco 300 ST-R

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XT250
Yamaha 2022 XT250

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 294.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine 2 stroke Sherco proprietary design Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke single; 2 valves
Engine Starting Geared system with folding lever Electric Start
Engine Lubrication 2% oil pre-mix --
Clutch Hydraulic, diaphragm system --
Fuel System -- Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI)
Ignition Hidria digital TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Transmission 5 speed 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Frame Tubular section Chrome-moly --
Tyres
Front Morad 21” black rim 2.75-21
Rear Morad 18” black rim 120/80-18
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 185 mm Hydraulically activated, floating Single disc, 245mm
Rear -- Single disc, 203mm
Suspension
Front 39 mm Steel Tech fork 35mm telescopic fork; 8.9-in travel
Rear 175 mm Progressive link system with single adjustable shock absorber Single shock, adjustable preload; 7.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2148 mm
Width -- 805 mm
Height -- 1160 mm
Seat Height -- 830
Wheelbase 1322 mm 1358 mm
Ground Clearance 310 mm 284 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 2.4 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features - Cylinder head: improved compression rate and dome-shaped head
- Crankshaft: new balancing, reduced vibration, more torque in the mid-range and at high revs
- New CDI curve: increased power at low rpms
- Removable rear exhaust bracket
- R16v shock absorber
Advanced LCD Instruments
Extended Fuel Range
Comfortable Saddle
Protective Fenders
Passenger-Ready
Bright Illumination
Dual Sport Lighting
Fork Protection
Forest-Friendly Exhaust
Modern Battery
Nimble Steering
Dirt-Ready Wheels
Low Maintenance Engine
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 26.4°
Trail: 4.2 in
Fuel Economy: 76 mpg
Wet Weight: 291 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4395