Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS vs Yamaha 2022 MT-10

Compare Specifications of Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS and Yamaha 2022 MT-10

Selected Bikes

Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS
Suzuki GSX-R1000 ABS

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 MT-10
Yamaha 2022 MT-10

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999.80 cc 998.00 cc
Engine 4-CYLINDER, 4-STROKE, LIQUID-COOLED, DOHC Liquid-cooled DOHC inline 4-cylinder; 16 valves
Engine Starting Electric --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection with YCC-T
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 202 PS @13200 rpm --
Maximum Torque 117.6 Nm @10800 rpm --
Transmission 6-SPEED CONSTANT MESH WITH SLIPPER CLUTCH 6-speed; wet multiplate assist and slipper clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Display -- 4.2-Inch Full-Color TFT Display
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Rear -- 190/55ZR17 Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminium wheels --
Brakes
Front 320MM T-DRIVE DISCS, BREMBO RADIAL-MOUNT MONOBLOC CALIPERS Dual 320mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Rear 220MM DISC, NISSIN SINGLE-PISTON CALIPER 220mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Suspension
Front 43 MM SHOWA BIG PISTON FRONT (BPF) FORKS 43mm KYB inverted fork, fully adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Rear SHOWA REAR SHOCK - LINK TYPE, COIL SPRING, OIL DAMPED KYB piggyback shock, fully adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Colors Available
Colors METALLIC MAT BLACK NO.2 , METALLIC TRITON BLUE, PEARL MIRA RED Cyan Storm
Matte Raven Black


Physical Specs
Length 2075 mm 2100 mm
Width 705 mm 800 mm
Height 1145 mm 1165 mm
Weight 202 kg --
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase 1420 mm 1404 mm
Ground Clearance -- 134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- New Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids
New Acoustic Amplifier Grilles
Improved Quick Shift System (QSS)
Cruise Control System
Ride-By-Wire Throttle Now with APSG
Yamaha Variable Speed Limiter (YVSL)
Four-Mode Yamaha Ride Control (YRC)
Improved Quick Shift System (QSS)
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 24.0°
Trail: 4.0 in
Fuel Economy: 36 mpg
Wet Weight: 467 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7320