Suzuki KATANA vs Yamaha 2022 MT-10 SP

Compare Specifications of Suzuki KATANA and Yamaha 2022 MT-10 SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki KATANA
Suzuki KATANA

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 MT-10 SP
Yamaha 2022 MT-10 SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999.00 cc 998.00 cc
Engine IN-LINE 4 CYLINDER, LIQUID-COOLED, DOHC Liquid-cooled DOHC inline 4-cylinder; 16 valves
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch BACK-TORQUE LIMITING CLUTCH --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection with YCC-T
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Transmission 6-SPEED 6-speed; wet multiplate assist and slipper clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Display -- Premium 4.2-Inch Full-Color TFT Display
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Rear -- 190/55ZR17 Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Brakes
Front BREMBO RADIAL-MOUNT MONOBLOC CALIPERS, 310 MM DICS WITH ABS Dual 320mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Rear NISSIN SINGLE PISTON CALIPER WITH ABS 220mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Suspension
Front 43 MM KYB FULLY ADJUSTABLE INVERTED FORKS 43mm Öhlins electronically controlled suspension, fully adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Rear LINK TYPE SHOCK WITH ADJUSTABLE REBOUND & SPRING PRELOAD Öhlins electronically controlled suspension, fully adjustable; 4.7-in travel
Colors Available
Colors METALLIC MYSTIC SILVER, GLASS SPARKLE BLACK Liquid Metal/Raven


Physical Specs
Length 2125 mm 2100 mm
Width 830 mm 800 mm
Height 1110 mm 1165 mm
Weight 215 kg --
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase 1460 mm 1404 mm
Ground Clearance -- 134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
Features - Three-mode traction control system
- KATANA themed LCD instrument cluster
- Two-tone seat
- Blacked-out exhaust
Compact Stacked Transmission
High-Capacity Cooling System
Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids
Advanced Quick Shift System (QSS)
Four-Mode Yamaha Ride Control (YRC)
Variable Speed Limiter (YVSL)
Cruise Control System
Advanced Ride-By-Wire Throttle with APSG
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 24.0°
Trail: 4.0 in
Fuel Economy: 36 mpg
Wet Weight: 472 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5314