SYM Cruisym 300 E5 2022 vs Yamaha Tricity 300

Compare Specifications of SYM Cruisym 300 E5 2022 and Yamaha Tricity 300

Selected Bikes

SYM Cruisym 300 E5 2022
SYM Cruisym 300 E5 2022

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 300
Yamaha Tricity 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 278.00 cc 292.00 cc
Engine 1 cylinder, liquid cooled 4 stroke, OHC, 4 valves Single cylinder, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System E.F.I Fuel Injection
Ignition Keyless TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooled liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 26 PS @ 7500 RPM 27.6 PS @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque 26.2 NM @ 6750 RPM 29.0 NM @ 5750 RPM
Transmission Automatic V-Belt Automatic
Drivetrain Primary Drive: Belt
Final Drive: Belt
--
Display LCD Display --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120 / 70-14 120/70-14M/C 55P Tubeless
Rear 140 / 60-13 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 13 inch Alloy Rim Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disc Ø 260mm + ABS Hydraulic disc brake, Ø267 mm
Rear Hydraulic Disc Disc Ø 240mm + ABS Hydraulic single disc brake, Ø267 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork Double telescopic fork
Rear Dual Shock Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors GREY CRUISYM 300 E5 GREY
WHITE CRUISYM 300 E5 WHITE
MATT BLUE CRUISYM 300 E5 MATT BLUE
Nimbus Grey
Tech Kamo
Gunmetal Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2189 mm 2250 mm
Width 756 mm 815 mm
Height 1432 mm 1470 mm
Weight 194 kg 239 kg
Seat Height 760 795
Wheelbase 1550 mm 1595 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features - Euro 5 Exhaust System
- Under seat storage
- Quick Charge 3.0
- Fuel Filler Cap
- Powerful 278cc Engine
- LED rear Lighting
- Naked LED Projector Headlight
- New LCD Instrument
- Ergonomic footplate
- Hydraulic disc brakes front and rear
- 3-wheel Urban Mobility with Tricity DNA
- Economical and powerful 300cc BLUE CORE engine
- Standing Assist System
- Lightest in class / Autonomy
- Large storage space
- LCD instruments and high-quality finish
- Large diameter disc brakes
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 3.3 l / 100 km
CO2 emission : 77g / km
Front travel : 100 mm
Rear travel : 84 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5820