Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap vs Trek Supercaliber 9.7

Compare Specifications of Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap and Trek Supercaliber 9.7

Selected Bikes

Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap
Trek 2020 Emonda SL7 Disc eTap

Brand:

Model:

Trek Supercaliber 9.7
Trek Supercaliber 9.7

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- Combined weight of bicycle, rider, and cargo of 300 pounds (136 kg)
Frame Ultralight 500 Series OCLV Carbon, Ride Tuned performance tube optimization, tapered head tube, internal routing, Ride Tuned seatmast, DuoTrap S compatible, flat mount disc OCLV Mountain Carbon main frame & stays, IsoStrut, tapered head tube, Knock Block, Control Freak internal routing, Boost148, 60 mm travel
Stem Bontrager Pro, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree Size : S - Bontrager Rhythm Comp, 31.8 mm, Knock Block, 0 degree, 60 mm length
Size : M, M/L - Bontrager Rhythm Comp, 31.8 mm, Knock Block, 0 degree, 70 mm length
Size : L, XL - Bontrager Rhythm Comp, 31.8 mm, Knock Block, 0 degree, 80 mm length
Handle Bar Bontrager Elite VR-C, alloy, 31.8 mm Bontrager Comp, alloy, 31.8 mm, 5 mm rise, 720 mm width
Fork Emonda SL full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc RockShox Reba RL, Solo Air spring, Motion Control damper, tapered steerer, 42mm offset, Boost110, 15mm Maxle Stealth, 100 mm travel
Seatpost Bontrager Ride Tuned carbon seatmast cap, 20 mm offset Size : S - Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 31.6 mm, 8 mm offset, 330 mm length
Size : M, M/L, L, XL - Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 31.6 mm, 8 mm offset, 400 mm length
Grip Bontrager Supertack Perf tape Bontrager XR Trail Comp, nylon lock-on
Crankset SRAM Force Size : S - SRAM NX Eagle, DUB, 32T alloy ring, Boost (52 mm chainline), 170 mm length
Size : M, M/L, L, XL - SRAM NX Eagle, DUB, 32T alloy ring, Boost (52 mm chainline), 175 mm length
Chain SRAM Force, 12 speed SRAM NX Eagle, 12 speed
Shifters SRAM Force eTap AXS, 12 speed SRAM NX Eagle, 12 speed
Saddle Bontrager Montrose Comp, steel rails, 138 mm width Bontrager Montrose Comp, steel rails, 138 mm width
Headset FSA Integrated, sealed cartridge bearing, 1-1/8-inch top, 1.5-inch bottom Size : S, M, M/L, L, XL - Knock Block Integrated, 58-degree radius, cartridge bearing, 1-1/8'' top, 1.5'' bottom
Derailleur Front SRAM Force eTap AXS, braze-on --
Derailleur Rear SRAM Force eTap AXS, Orbit chain management, 33 T max cog SRAM NX Eagle
Hub Rear -- Bontrager alloy, sealed bearing, alloy axle, 6-bolt, Boost110, 15 mm thru axle
Cassette SRAM Force XG-1270, 10-28, 12 speed SRAM PG-1230 Eagle, 11-50, 12 speed
Chainrings 48 / 35 36T
Bottom Bracket -- SRAM DUB, 92 mm, PressFit
Tyres
Front Bontrager R2 Hard-Case Lite, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 700 x 25 c Bontrager XR2 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Inner Strength sidewall, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 29 x 2.20''
Rear Bontrager R2 Hard-Case Lite, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 700 x 25 c Bontrager XR2 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Inner Strength sidewall, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 29 x 2.20''
Wheel / RIM -- Front : Bontrager Kovee Elite 23 carbon, Tubeless Ready, 6-bolt, Boost110, 15 mm thru axle
Rear : Bontrager Kovee Elite 23 carbon, Tubeless Ready, centerlock, Shimano 8/9/10 freehub, Boost148, 12 mm thru axle
Brakes
Front -- Shimano hydraulic disc, MT501 lever, MT500 caliper
Brake Rotor : Shimano RT56, 6-bolt, 180 mm
Rear -- Shimano hydraulic disc, MT501 lever, MT500 caliper
Brake Rotor : Shimano RT56, 6-bolt, 160 mm
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Matte Black / Gloss Blue Marigold to Radioactive Red Fade
Trek Black/Trek White


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 11.51 kg
Overview
Features -- - IsoStrut
- OCLV Mountain Carbon
- Straight Shot with Knock Block
- Control Freak Cable Management
- Water Bottle Capacity
- Complete Tubeless System
- Suspension Calculator
Additional Details Axles
Front : 12 x 100 mm thru axle
Rear : 142 x 12 mm thru axle
Shock : Trek IsoStrut, Fox Performance shock, air spring, DPS 2-position damper, 235 x 32.5 mm
Max compatible fork travel : 120 mm (531 mm axle-to-crown)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8738