Veo Cosmo 1 vs Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Compare Specifications of Veo Cosmo 1 and Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Selected Bikes

Veo Cosmo 1
Veo Cosmo 1

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 125 2022
Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 500W rear drive --
Range 55 miles --
Engine Displacement -- 125.00 cc
Engine -- 4-stroke;Liquid-cooled;SOHC;Single cylinder;4-valves;EURO5
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Maximum Power -- 12 PS @ @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 299 Kg --
Transmission -- V-Belt Automatic
Top Speed 24 kmph --
Battery Lithium-ion --
Display Digital Iot LCD Display
Frame Aluminum alloy --
Seats Padded foam --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 18-inch 90/80-14M/C 43P Tubeless
Rear 18-inch 130/70-13M/C 63P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Dual mechanical Two Hydraulic disc brakes
Rear Dual mechanical Hydraulic single disc brake
Suspension
Front -- Front suspension system : Telescopic forks
Front travel : 90 mm
Rear -- Rear suspension system Unit Swing
Rear travel : 90 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Matt Grey


Physical Specs
Length 1625 mm 1995 mm
Width -- 750 mm
Height 1066 mm 1215 mm
Weight -- 168 kg
Seat Height 711 785
Wheelbase -- 1410 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 7.2 litres
Overview
Features Connection: 4G LTE + Bluetooth
Swappable Battery System
- New EURO5 Blue Core 125cc engine
- Optimised three-wheel layout
- New chassis for increased comfort
- Start & Stop engine technology
- Newly developed twin shock rear suspension
- Front and rear disc brakes with optimised UBS
- New LCD instruments with smartphone connectivity
- New Smart Key keyless operation
- Larger footboard area
- LED headlight with broader beam
- Underseat storage and front pocket
Additional Details Lighting: LED front and rear
Suspension: front and rear
Fuel consumption : 2.3 L/100 km
CO2 emission : 54 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2263