Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec vs Yamaha 2022 MT-09

Compare Specifications of Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec and Yamaha 2022 MT-09

Selected Bikes

Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec
Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 MT-09
Yamaha 2022 MT-09

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 942.00 cc 890.00 cc
Engine Air-cooled SOHC V-twin; 4 valves Liquid-cooled, DOHC, inline 3-cylinder; 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel System Fuel injection Fuel injection with YCC-T
Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch 6-speed; multiplate assist and slipper clutch
Drivetrain Final Drive: Belt Final Drive: Chain
Display -- 3.5-inch Full-Color TFT Instrument Display
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 100/90-19 Bridgestone® EXEDRA G721 F 120/70ZR17M/C
Rear 150/80-16 Bridgestone® EXEDRA G722 R 180/55ZR17M/C
Brakes
Front Hydraulic single disc, 298mm Dual 298mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Rear Hydraulic single disc, 298mm 245mm hydraulic disc; ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork, 4.7-in travel 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel
Rear Dual piggyback shocks, 2.8-in travel Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 4.8-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Storm Gray Team Yamaha Blue
Cyan Storm
Matte Raven Black


Physical Specs
Length 2291 mm 2090 mm
Width 944 mm 795 mm
Height 1120 mm 1191 mm
Seat Height 690 825
Wheelbase 1569 mm 1430 mm
Ground Clearance 129 mm 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features Low Seat Height
Powerful Braking
Unique Bolt Exhaust System
Ride-by-Wire YCC-T Throttle System with New APSG
Quick Shift System for Clutchless Upshifts & Downshifts
Brake Control System with ABS
MotoGP-Developed Slide Control System (SCS)
Lift Control System (LIF)
Lean Angle-Sensitive Traction Control System
Rider-Supporting Traction Control System
Six-Axis IMU
Assist & Slipper Clutch
Offset & Direct-Plated Cylinders
Additional Details Fuel Economy: 51 mpg
Wet Weight: 542 lb
Rake (Caster Angle): 29.0°
Trail: 5.1 in
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 4.3 in
Fuel Economy: 49 MPG
Wet Weight: 417 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3140