Yamaha 2022 MT-09 vs Yamaha MT-09

Compare Specifications of Yamaha 2022 MT-09 and Yamaha MT-09

Selected Bikes

Yamaha 2022 MT-09
Yamaha 2022 MT-09

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha MT-09
Yamaha MT-09

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 890.00 cc 847.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, DOHC, inline 3-cylinder; 4 valves per cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, 3-cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet Sump
Fuel System Fuel injection with YCC-T Fuel Injection
Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition TCI
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Transmission 6-speed; multiplate assist and slipper clutch Constant mesh 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Final Drive: Chain --
Display 3.5-inch Full-Color TFT Instrument Display --
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17M/C 120/70 ZR 17M/C(58W) Tubeless
Rear 180/55ZR17M/C 180/55 ZR 17M/C(73W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Dual 298mm hydraulic disc; ABS Hydraulic dual discs
Rear 245mm hydraulic disc; ABS Hydraulic single disc
Suspension
Front 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel Telescopic forks
Rear Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 4.8-in travel Swingarm (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Team Yamaha Blue
Cyan Storm
Matte Raven Black
--


Physical Specs
Length 2090 mm 2075 mm
Width 795 mm 815 mm
Height 1191 mm 1120 mm
Weight -- 193 kg
Seat Height 825 --
Wheelbase 1430 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance 139 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features Ride-by-Wire YCC-T Throttle System with New APSG
Quick Shift System for Clutchless Upshifts & Downshifts
Brake Control System with ABS
MotoGP-Developed Slide Control System (SCS)
Lift Control System (LIF)
Lean Angle-Sensitive Traction Control System
Rider-Supporting Traction Control System
Six-Axis IMU
Assist & Slipper Clutch
Offset & Direct-Plated Cylinders
--
Additional Details Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 4.3 in
Fuel Economy: 49 MPG
Wet Weight: 417 lb
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7681