Yamaha 2022 XSR900 vs Yamaha XVS950A

Compare Specifications of Yamaha 2022 XSR900 and Yamaha XVS950A

Selected Bikes

Yamaha 2022 XSR900
Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XVS950A
Yamaha XVS950A

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 890.00 cc 942.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled DOHC inline 3-cylinder 4-stroke; 12 valves Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC 4-valve, V-twin
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Yamaha Fuel Injection with YCC-T Fuel Injection
Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition TCI
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Transmission 6-speed; multiplate assist-and-slipper wet clutch Constant mesh 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Final Drive: Chain --
Display Full-Color 3.5-inch TFT Instrument Display --
Frame -- Steel double cradle
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22 130/70-18M/C 63H Tubeless
Rear 180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22 170/70B16M/C 75H Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 298mm dual hydraulic discs; ABS Hydraulic single disc, 320 mm
Rear 245mm single hydraulic disc; ABS Hydraulic single disc, 298 mm
Suspension
Front 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel Telescopic forks, 135 mm travel
Rear Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 5.4-in travel Swingarm (link suspenson), 110 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Legend Blue
Raven
--


Physical Specs
Length 2153 mm 2435 mm
Width 861 mm 985 mm
Height 1155 mm 1080 mm
Weight -- 278 kg
Seat Height 810 --
Wheelbase 1496 mm 1685 mm
Ground Clearance 139 mm 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features Tuned Triple Soundtrack
New Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids
Cruise Control
Lean Sensitive Traction Control System
Slide Control System (SCS)
LIFT Control System (LIF)
Brake Control System (BC)
Advanced Ride-by-Wire Throttle with APSG
Advanced Up & Down Quick Shift Now Standard
Assist & Slipper (A&S) Clutch
--
Additional Details Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 4.3 in
Wet Weight: 425 lb
Fuel Economy: 49 mpg
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4138