Yamaha Aerox 155 VVA S-Version vs Yamaha Aerox 2021 ABS

Compare Specifications of Yamaha Aerox 155 VVA S-Version and Yamaha Aerox 2021 ABS

Selected Bikes

Yamaha Aerox 155 VVA S-Version
Yamaha Aerox 155 VVA S-Version

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Aerox 2021 ABS
Yamaha Aerox 2021 ABS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 155.10 cc 155.00 cc
Engine Liquid cooled 4-stroke, SOHC 4-stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valve, water cooled.
Engine Starting Electric Electric hand start SMART MOTOR GENERATOR
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Wet
Clutch Dry, Centrifugal Automatic Automatic centrifugal dry clutch
Fuel System Fuel Injection --
Ignition TCI TCI
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Water cooled.
Maximum Power 14.7 hp @ 8000 rpm --
Maximum Torque 13.8 Nm @ 6250 rpm --
Transmission V-belt automatic Automatic V-belt (V - Belt)
Battery YTZ7V 12 V, 6.0 Ah / YTZ7V (MF)
Frame Underbone Frame type : Backbone
Gear -- Gear ratio : 10.769 (56/16 x 40/13)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 110 / 80-14M / C 53P 110 / 80-14 M / C 53P
Rear 140 / 70-14M / C 62P 140 / 70-14 M / C 62P
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Single disc
Rear Drum Drum brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Unit Swing unit
Colors Available
Colors -- Gray
Black
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm 1980 mm
Width 700 mm 700 mm
Height 1125 mm 1150 mm
Weight 118 kg 125 kg
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1350 mm
Ground Clearance 142 mm 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 4.6 litres 5.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Spark plug type : NGK / CPR8EA-9
Oil supply system : Injector model
Stop and Start System : Only available in ABS Version
Smart Key System : Only available in ABS Version
Fuel oil : Gasohol E10 to E20
Engine oil capacity : 0.9 liter
Automatic ratio (front / rear) : 2.300 - 0.724: 1
Air filter : Oil coated paper filter
Radiator capacity : 0.46 liter
Radiator tank capacity: 0.13 liter
Cylinder type : Diasil
Caster Angle / Trailing : 26.50 / 100 mm
Turning radius : 2,000 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6885