Yamaha E01 vs Zapp i300 Carbon

Compare Specifications of Yamaha E01 and Zapp i300 Carbon

Selected Bikes

Yamaha E01
Yamaha E01

Brand:

Model:

Zapp i300 Carbon
Zapp i300 Carbon

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Air-cooled DC brushless motor 7.2kW
Range -- 60 km (ECO Mode)
Engine Starting Electric Start Air-Cooled Interior Permanent Magnet Electric Motor (IPM)
Cooling System Air-cooled Air-Cooled
Maximum Power -- 20 HP
Maximum Torque -- 85 Nm (at the crank); 587 Nm (at Rear Wheel)
Load Carrying Capacity -- 250 kgs
Seating Capacity -- 1 Passengers / Max. 150 kg
Drivetrain -- Centred Swing-Arm, Carbon Reinforced Belt Drive with 6.9:1 Single Reduction Ratio via Secondary Carbon Fiber Belt
Top Speed -- 96 kmph
Riding Modes -- ECO : Output Capped at 4 kW
POWER: Output Capped at 11 kW
ZAPP : Output Capped at 18 kW
Battery Lithium-ion battery 72V Lithium-ion; 720Wh per Battery Pack
Battery Pack : 2 x Air-Cooled, Ultra Portable Lithium-ion Battery Packs
Battery Weight :6 kg Per Battery Pack
Battery Warranty -- 36 Months
Frame -- Aerospace Grade Alloy Load-Bearing Exoskeleton Over Chrome-Moly Steel Tube Underbone
Tyres
Front -- 120/70 R14
Rear -- 140/60 R14
Wheel / RIM Alloy Cast Aluminium
Front Wheel : 3.50 x 14"
Rear Wheel : 4.25 x 14"
Brakes
Front Disc Full Floating Single 255mm Ø disc, 4-Piston Radial Mounted Caliper
Rear Disc Single 220mm Ø disc, Dual-Piston Caliper
Suspension
Front -- Front Suspension Travel : 100 mm
100 mm Upside-Down Fork 31 mm
Rear -- Single-Sided Swing Arm with a Direct-Link Spring Strut, Adjustable Spring Preload
Rear Suspension Travel : 70 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Guard's Red


Physical Specs
Length 1960 mm 1935 mm
Width 810 mm 862 mm
Height 1190 mm 1193 mm
Weight -- 92 kg
Seat Height -- 750
Wheelbase -- 1397 mm
Overview
Features - Fast-Charge Compatible
- Sporty Styling
--
Additional Details Seating capacity : 2 Castor / Rake : 26.5°
Trail : 86 mm
Head Angle / Fork Angle : 80°
Emission : Zero

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1906