Yamaha Force 2.0 vs Yamaha Mio Aerox

Compare Specifications of Yamaha Force 2.0 and Yamaha Mio Aerox

Selected Bikes

Yamaha Force 2.0
Yamaha Force 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Mio Aerox
Yamaha Mio Aerox

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 155.00 cc 155.00 cc
Engine Water-cooled four-stroke single cylinder 4V Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve, Single Cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric starter
Engine Lubrication -- Wet Sump
Clutch -- Dry, Centrifugal Shoe
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI (Transistor Controlled Ignition)
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15.0 PS @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 13.8 NM @ 6250 RPM
Transmission -- V-belt automatic
Battery -- YTZ7V
Display LCD Display --
Frame -- Backbone
Headlamp Halogen bulb/ 55W LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 120 / 70-13 M / C 53P 110/80-14 M/C 53P Tubeless
Rear 130 / 70-13 M / C 57P 140/70-14 M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 267 mm / one-way double-piston caliper Disc brake Hydraulic Single Disc Brake
Rear 230 mm / one-way double-piston caliper Disc brake Mechanical Leading Trailing Drum Brake
Suspension
Front Upright fork Telescopic Fork
Rear Preload adjustable double rear shock Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Night Titanium Black
Meteorite Ash (Extinction)
Cold and white
Sandstorm Green (Extinction)
Race Blu
Vibrant Orange
Black Raven


Physical Specs
Length 1895 mm 1990 mm
Width 760 mm 700 mm
Height 1120 mm 1125 mm
Weight 130 kg 116 kg
Seat Height 815 790
Wheelbase 1340 mm 1350 mm
Ground Clearance -- 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 4.6 litres
Overview
Features VVA
SMG
TCS
- 25 LITER COMPARTMENT
- 5.8” LCD DIGITAL METER PANEL
- ELECTRIC SOCKET
- VARIABLE VALVE ACTUATION
Additional Details Energy efficiency rating Level 1: (over 150c.c.~250c.c.)
Annual fuel consumption (liter): 100
Test value (average fuel consumption) : 44.9 (km/liter)
Engine oil capacity : 1.0 L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1478