Yamaha MT-09TR vs Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Compare Specifications of Yamaha MT-09TR and Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Selected Bikes

Yamaha MT-09TR
Yamaha MT-09TR

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ900P (Police)
Yamaha XJ900P (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 847.00 cc 892.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, 3-cylinder Air-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC,Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Force-feed lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System Fuel Injection Carburetor
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline (Gasohol [E10] acceptable)
Ignition TCI T.C.I.
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air-cooled
Maximum Power -- 88.2 PS @ 8250 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 83.5 NM @ 7000 RPM
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4--5
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Shaft
Battery -- 12 V, 12.0 Ah
Frame Diamond Double cradle
Gear -- Gear ratio : 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th 2.188 (35/16), 1.500 (30/20), 1.154, (30/26), 0.933 (28/30), 0.813 (26/32)
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17 M/C (58W) Tubeless 120/70-17 58V tubeless
Rear 180/55ZR17 M/C (73W) Tubeless 150/70-17 69V tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front wheel travel : 140 mm
Rear wheel travel : 110 mm
Brakes
Front 298 mm Hydraulic dual discs 320 mm Dual disc
Rear 245 mm Hydraulic single disc 267 mm Single disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic forks, 137 mm travel Telescopic forks
Rear Swingarm (link suspension), 142 mm travel Swingarm (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2160 mm 2230 mm
Width 850 mm 900 mm
Height 1375 mm 1490 mm
Weight 214 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 297
Seat Height -- 795
Wheelbase 1500 mm 1505 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 24.0 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 4.2 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.672 (97/58)
Secondary reduction ratio : 3.717 (46/38 x 19/18 x 32/11)
Caster angle : 27°
Trail : 121 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3499