Yamaha R6 vs Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Compare Specifications of Yamaha R6 and Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Selected Bikes

Yamaha R6
Yamaha R6

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)
Yamaha XJ6SAP (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 599.00 cc 600.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, forward-inclined parallel 4-cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC , Inline, 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System Fuel Injection Fuel injection
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline
Ignition TCI TCI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power -- 57.0 kW @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 59.7 NM @ 8500 RPM
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed Constant mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Chain
Battery -- 12 V, 10.0 Ah
Frame Aluminium Deltabox Diamond shape
Gear -- Gear ratio 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th/6th : 2.846 (37/13), 1.947 (37/19), 1.556(28/18), 1.333 (32/24), 1.190 (25/21), 1.083 (26/24)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) Tubeless 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) tubeless
Rear 180/55 ZR17M/C (73W) Tubeless 160/60 ZR17M/C (69W) tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front wheel travel : 130 mm
Rear wheel travel : 130 mm
Brakes
Front Hydraulic dual disc 298 mm Dual disc Brake
Rear Hydraulic single disc 245 mm Single disc Brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic forks Telescopic forks
Rear Swingarm (link suspension) Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2040 mm 2120 mm
Width 695 mm 800 mm
Height 1150 mm 1285 mm
Weight 190 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 241
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1375 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Siren & speaker
- Document box
- Side cases (Photo)
- Engine guard
- Anti-lock brake system (ABS)
- High windshield
- Raised handlebars
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 3.4 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 1.955 (86/44)
Secondary reduction ratio : 2.875 (46/16)
Caster angle : 26°
Trail : 103 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6102