Zapp i300 Carbon vs ZEV 2700 DLR

Compare Specifications of Zapp i300 Carbon and ZEV 2700 DLR

Selected Bikes

Zapp i300 Carbon
Zapp i300 Carbon

Brand:

Model:

ZEV 2700 DLR
ZEV 2700 DLR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 7.2kW Dual stator motor
Range 60 km (ECO Mode) 32 kph :112 Km in Single Charge
48 kph :72 Km in Single Charge
Engine Starting Air-Cooled Interior Permanent Magnet Electric Motor (IPM) --
Cooling System Air-Cooled --
Maximum Power 20 HP --
Maximum Torque 85 Nm (at the crank); 587 Nm (at Rear Wheel) --
Load Carrying Capacity 250 kgs --
Seating Capacity 1 Passengers / Max. 150 kg --
Drivetrain Centred Swing-Arm, Carbon Reinforced Belt Drive with 6.9:1 Single Reduction Ratio via Secondary Carbon Fiber Belt --
Top Speed 96 kmph 56 kmph
Riding Modes ECO : Output Capped at 4 kW
POWER: Output Capped at 11 kW
ZAPP : Output Capped at 18 kW
--
Battery 72V Lithium-ion; 720Wh per Battery Pack
Battery Pack : 2 x Air-Cooled, Ultra Portable Lithium-ion Battery Packs
Battery Weight :6 kg Per Battery Pack
4.2 Kwh Lead Silicate
Battery Warranty 36 Months --
Frame Aerospace Grade Alloy Load-Bearing Exoskeleton Over Chrome-Moly Steel Tube Underbone --
Tyres
Front 120/70 R14 --
Rear 140/60 R14 --
Wheel / RIM Cast Aluminium
Front Wheel : 3.50 x 14"
Rear Wheel : 4.25 x 14"
Alloy
Brakes
Front Full Floating Single 255mm Ø disc, 4-Piston Radial Mounted Caliper Disc Brake
Rear Single 220mm Ø disc, Dual-Piston Caliper Disc Brake
Suspension
Front Front Suspension Travel : 100 mm
100 mm Upside-Down Fork 31 mm
--
Rear Single-Sided Swing Arm with a Direct-Link Spring Strut, Adjustable Spring Preload
Rear Suspension Travel : 70 mm
--
Colors Available
Colors Guard's Red Yellow
White
Green
Orange


Physical Specs
Length 1935 mm --
Width 862 mm --
Height 1193 mm --
Weight 92 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117
Seat Height 750 --
Wheelbase 1397 mm 1358 mm
Overview
Features -- - Front Basket
- Low Maintenance
- Eco-Friendly
Additional Details Castor / Rake : 26.5°
Trail : 86 mm
Head Angle / Fork Angle : 80°
Emission : Zero
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1860