Husqvarna TE 250i vs Kawasaki KX 250 50th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna TE 250i and Kawasaki KX 250 50th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna TE 250i
Husqvarna TE 250i

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki KX 250 50th Anniversary Edition
Kawasaki KX 250 50th Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine 4-stroke single, DOHC, liquid-cooled
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics --
Fuel System -- DFI with 44mm Keihin throttle body and dual injectors
Ignition -- Digital CDI
Climbing Degree 63.5 ° --
Transmission -- 5-speed, return shift, with wet multi-disc manual clutch
Battery Li-Ion battery --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Aluminum perimeter
Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" --
Tyres
Front -- 80/100-21
Rear -- 110/90-19
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc brake Single semi-floating 270mm Braking petal disc with dual-piston caliper
Rear 220 mm Disc brake Single 240mm Braking petal disc with single-piston caliper
Suspension
Front WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
48mm inverted telescopic coil-spring fork with 23-way compression damping and 20-way rebound damping /12.4 in
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Uni-Trak with dual-range (2.25 turns high speed/21-way low-speed) compression damping, 38-way rebound damping and adjustable preload/12.4 in
Colors Available
Colors -- Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length -- 2189.48 mm
Width -- 820.42 mm
Height -- 1270 mm
Weight 106.2 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 108
Seat Height 950 960.12
Wheelbase -- 1485.9 mm
Ground Clearance 360 mm 345.44 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.5 litres 6 litres
Overview
About -- The Kawasaki KX 250 50th Anniversary Edition is a high-performance 249cc motorcycle with a 4-st Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details CO2 Emissions : 59 g/km
EMS : AET digital
Fuel Consumption : 2.55 l/100 km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4699