NAKTO Ranger Premium vs Velorbis Electric Arrow Classic Gents

Compare Specifications of NAKTO Ranger Premium and Velorbis Electric Arrow Classic Gents

Selected Bikes

NAKTO Ranger Premium
NAKTO Ranger Premium

Brand:

Model:

Velorbis Electric Arrow Classic Gents
Velorbis Electric Arrow Classic Gents

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 350W hub-motor --
Range 96 km (60 miles) --
Charging Time 4-5 Hours --
Maximum Power 600W --
Maximum Torque 50 Nm --
Load Carrying Capacity 181 Kg (400 lbs) --
Top Speed 40 kmph --
Riding Modes 5-level Pedal-assist and thumb throttle --
Battery Tianneng 48V/8A lithium-ion, removable --
Display M5 LCD display --
Frame Nakto aluminum alloy frame Lightweight Lugged Steel Frame
Stem Steel --
Handle Bar Flat handlebar, aluminium alloy, 22.8" width --
Fork Trama 82B sprung fork, 60mm travel --
Seatpost Aluminium alloy dropper post, seat-height adjustability, 1" diameter --
Crankset Lide 44x152 --
Pedals Yonghua PA66 --
Pedal Assist System 0-5 level --
Chain Rust resistant --
Shifters Shimano 6-speed --
Gear Shimano 6-speed Gears --
Saddle Reinforced and ergonomic in black, 2 damping spring BROOKS
Derailleur Rear Shimano, MF-TZ500-6 --
Hub Rear 50Nm / 350W motor, integrated into the rear wheel, geared brushless motor Sturmey Archer
Spoke Carbon steel, silver --
Bottom Bracket Integral bottom bracket --
Headlamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 26"X1.75" Fat Tires Schwalbe
Rear 26"X1.75" Fat Tires Schwalbe
Wheel / RIM Aluminium alloy, silver RIM 28 inch
Brakes
Front Shimano steel disc brake --
Rear Shimano steel disc brake --
Brake Lever Aluminium alloy, black --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1420 mm
Width -- 260 mm
Height -- 840 mm
Weight 24 kg 21 kg
Overview
About The NAKTO Ranger Premium is an electric bicycle with a 600W motor that delivers 50 Nm of torque Read More --
Features -- Lightweight Lugged Steel Frame
100% Upright Riding Position
Powerfull Pendix Center Motor
Low Maintenance Quality Components

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1628