Naon Lucy vs NIU MQi GT

Compare Specifications of Naon Lucy and NIU MQi GT

Selected Bikes

Naon Lucy
Naon Lucy

Brand:

Model:

NIU MQi GT
NIU MQi GT

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Electric Hub Motor Bosch
Range -- 80km
Charging Time -- 4 Hours (Single) 4.5 Hours (Dual)
Engine Starting -- Electric
Maximum Power 7 kW --
Maximum Torque 200 Nm --
Load Carrying Capacity -- 269 Kg
Seating Capacity -- 2
Top Speed -- 70 kmph
Speed -- E-Save Mode: 25km/h
Dynamic Mode: 55km/h
Sport Mode: 70km/h
Riding Modes -- 3 Modes - E-Save,Dynamic,Sport
Battery Swappable batteries Type: 18650 Lithium Ion
Battery Technology: 4th Gen Niu Energy Smart Power Tech
Pack Weight : 14Kg x 2
Voltage:48V
Charger -- 9A (Single) / 16A (Dual)
Display -- LED Display provides Battery status, Riding mode, Speed connectivity, and more.
Frame Aluminum frame --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-14
Rear -- 110/80-14
Wheel / RIM -- 14” inch Alloy wheels
Brakes
Front Disc ABS 220mm Hydraulic Disc
Rear Disc 180mm Hydraulic DIsc
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- White
Red
Blue
Silver
Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 1949 mm
Width -- 700 mm
Height -- 1171 mm
Weight -- 115 kg
Seat Height -- 816
Wheelbase -- 1389 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Overview
About The Naon Lucy is an electric scooter that delivers a commendable 7 kW of power and an impressiv Read More --
Features - Transparent Windshield
- Under seat storage

Naon Lucy
Disc Brake with ABS

Naon Lucy
Aluminum Frame

Naon Lucy
In-wheel Hub Motor

Naon Lucy
Swappable Battery

Naon Lucy
Suspension

Naon Lucy
Under seat storage
- Bluetooth keyless Entry
- Smart Electronic Steering Lock
- Keyless Compartment Unlocking
- Electronic Braking System (EBS)
- Wrap-around Steel Bumpers
- Durable Build
- Fast Charging
- In-app unauthorized movement notifications.
- Alerts sent directly to your phone.
- Real-time location of your e-moped.
- Trouble-shooting updates.
Additional Details -- Apps Connected: 3 Years
Energy Use per Charge: 3744Wh
Seat Length: 782 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4337