Piaggio MP3 Sport 500 vs Yamaha 2022 TMAX Tech MAX

Compare Specifications of Piaggio MP3 Sport 500 and Yamaha 2022 TMAX Tech MAX

Selected Bikes

Piaggio MP3 Sport 500
Piaggio MP3 Sport 500

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TMAX Tech MAX
Yamaha 2022 TMAX Tech MAX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 493.00 cc 562.00 cc
Engine Liquid cooled, Single cylinder, 4-stroke, 4 valves Liquid-cooled, parallel 2-cylinder, EURO5, 4-stroke, 4 valves, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Dry sump
Clutch Automatic centrifugal dry clutch --
Fuel System Electronic injection --
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 38.8 HP @ 7250 RPM 47.6 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 45.5 NM @ 5000 RPM 55.7 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission CVT continuously variable transmission with torque server V-belt automatic
Display -- TFT Color Display
Frame Double cradle in high resistance tubular steel Light Aluminium Frame
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front Tubeless 110/70 - 13” 120 / 70R15M / C 56H (tubeless)
Rear Tubeless 140/70 - 14” 160 / 60R15M / C 67H (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc 267 mm Hydraulic double disc brake
Rear Single 240 mm disc with hydraulic control 267 mm Hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front Articulated quadrilateral 120 mm Telescopic fork
Rear Dual hydraulic shock absorbers adjustable in preload 117 mm Swing arm
Colors Available
Colors Back
Glossy Gray
Matte Green
--


Physical Specs
Length 2225 mm --
Width 800 mm 780 mm
Height -- 1415 mm
Weight -- 220 kg
Seat Height 790 800
Wheelbase 1540 mm 1575 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features - Acceleration Slip Regulation (ASR) - New, networked TFT color display, navigation system with complete map material
- New, sporty, dynamic fairing design
- New projector headlights, integrated indicators
- Electrically adjustable windscreen
- Cruise control
- Smart Key-Keyless Operation
- Generously dimensioned storage space
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 4.8 L / 100 kmCO2 emission112 g / km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9393