WK SX 125 vs Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Compare Specifications of WK SX 125 and Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Selected Bikes

WK SX 125
WK SX 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 125 2022
Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke 4-stroke;Liquid-cooled;SOHC;Single cylinder;4-valves;EURO5
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 8.72 HP @ 7500 RPM 12 PS @ @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Transmission Automatic (Twist and Go) V-Belt Automatic
Display -- LCD Display
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 120/70-14 90/80-14M/C 43P Tubeless
Rear 120/70-14 130/70-13M/C 63P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disc 220mm Two Hydraulic disc brakes
Rear Hydraulic Disc 180mm Hydraulic single disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic forks Front suspension system : Telescopic forks
Front travel : 90 mm
Rear Twin Black Oil Shocks Rear suspension system Unit Swing
Rear travel : 90 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Matt Grey


Physical Specs
Length 1940 mm 1995 mm
Width 665 mm 750 mm
Height 1130 mm 1215 mm
Weight 100 kg 168 kg
Seat Height 800 785
Wheelbase -- 1410 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 4.1 litres 7.2 litres
Overview
Features Euro 5 Compliant
LED Rear Lights and Indicators
USB Charging Port
Underseat Storage
Combined Braking
Steel Braided Brake Lines
- New EURO5 Blue Core 125cc engine
- Optimised three-wheel layout
- New chassis for increased comfort
- Start & Stop engine technology
- Newly developed twin shock rear suspension
- Front and rear disc brakes with optimised UBS
- New LCD instruments with smartphone connectivity
- New Smart Key keyless operation
- Larger footboard area
- LED headlight with broader beam
- Underseat storage and front pocket
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 2.3 L/100 km
CO2 emission : 54 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9569