Aprilia SXR 50 vs Yamaha Neos 4

Compare Specifications of Aprilia SXR 50 and Yamaha Neos 4

Selected Bikes

Aprilia SXR 50
Aprilia SXR 50

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Neos 4
Yamaha Neos 4

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 49.00 cc 49.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke single-cylinder i-get Single cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled
Engine Starting Electrical Electric and kick
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Wet sump
Clutch Automatic centrifugal dry clutch --
Fuel System Electronic injection Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Forced air liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 3.26309 PS 3.08 PS @ 7000 RPM
Maximum Torque 3.3 Nm 3.15 NM @ 7000 RPM
Transmission Automatic continuously variable transmission (CVT) with torque server V-Belt Automatic
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 41.7 kmpl --
Tyres
Front Tubeless 120/70 - 12” 120/70-12
Rear Tubeless 120/70 - 12” 130/70-12
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 220-mm brake disc, served by 2 x 25.4-mm dual piston floating callipers Single Disc, Ø190 mm
Rear 140-mm drum Drum, Ø110 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic hydraulic fork, 76 mm stroke Telescopic forks
Rear Dual-action single shock absorber, adjustable to 5 positions Hydraulic unit swing
Colors Available
Colors Essence White
Power Red
Instinctive Grey
Enigma Black
Nimbus Grey
Competition White
Midnight Black


Physical Specs
Length 1965 mm 1840 mm
Width 690 mm 663 mm
Height -- 1125 mm
Weight -- 95 kg
Seat Height 775 790
Wheelbase 1360 mm 1275 mm
Ground Clearance -- 154 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 5.4 litres
Overview
About The Aprilia SXR 50 stands out with its sleek design and advanced technology. Featuring a 49cc 4 Read More --
Features -- - Excellent economy and lower emissions
- Iconic "twin-eye" headlight design
- Classy blue backlit LCD instrument panel
- Optional Unified Braking System for added control
- Lockable helmet/baggage compartment
- Power and space to take two in comfort
Additional Details Distribution - Single overhead camshaft (SOHC)
Chassis - Single cradle structure in tubular steel with pressed reinforcements
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

68