AGM Retro vs Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Compare Specifications of AGM Retro and Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Selected Bikes

AGM Retro
AGM Retro

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TMAX
Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement -- 562.00 cc
Engine -- Liquid-cooled, parallel 2-cylinder, EURO5, 4-stroke, 4 valves, DOHC
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Dry sump
Fuel System Electronically controlled carburettor Petrol injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 2.8 HP @ 7500 RPM 47.6 PS 2 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 55.7 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission Continuously variable transmission V-belt automatic
Top Speed 45 kmph --
Display -- 7-inch TFT Color Display
Handle Bar 880 mm Handlebar width --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 3.50-10 120 / 70R15M / C 56H (tubeless)
Rear 3.50-10 160 / 60R15M / C 67H (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Brake 267 mm Hydraulic double disc brake,
Rear Drum Brake 267 mm Hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front Double telescopic shock absorbers 120 mm Telescopic fork
Rear Mono shock absorber 117 mm Swing arm
Colors Available
Colors Smokey
Black
Extreme Yellow
Sword Grey
Icon Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1890 mm 2195 mm
Width 880 mm 780 mm
Height 1090 mm 1415 mm
Weight -- 218 kg
Kerb Weight 91 --
Seat Height -- 800
Wheelbase 1285 mm 1575 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 15 litres
Overview
Features - Unique retro looks
- Beautiful chrome accents give the scooter extra class
- Comfort for two people
- New, networked TFT color display, navigation system with complete map material-
- Powerful, EURO5-compliant engine
- New, sporty, dynamic fairing design
- New projector headlights, integrated indicators
- Improved ergonomics for the driver and front passenger
- Smart Key - keyless operation
- Light aluminum chassis
- Demanding, electronic control technology
- Generously dimensioned storage space
- Anti-theft main stand
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 4.8 L / 100 km
CO2 emission : 112 g / km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8822