AJS Insetto 125 vs Honda 2023 PCX 125

Compare Specifications of AJS Insetto 125 and Honda 2023 PCX 125

Selected Bikes

AJS Insetto 125
AJS Insetto 125

Brand:

Model:

Honda 2023 PCX 125
Honda 2023 PCX 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 3J4, 4-stroke, forced air-cooled Single cylinder, water cooled, eSP+ SOHC 4-stroke
Engine Starting Electric and kick Electric
Clutch -- Automatic, centrifugal, dry type
Fuel System Delphi electronic fuel injection
Fuel type - Unleaded or E5 petrol
--
Maximum Power 9 Ps @ 7500 Rpm 12.5 PS @ 87502 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 11.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Transmission CVT twist & go V-Matic
Drivetrain -- V-belt
Top Speed 38 kmph --
Battery -- 12V/7Ah (10H)
Display -- LCD Display
Frame -- Tubular steel duplex
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 47.6 kmpl
Tyres
Front 120/70-12 110/70-14M/C (50P)
Rear 130/70-12 130/70-13M/C (63P)
Wheel / RIM -- Front: 14M/C x MT2.75, 5 spoke cast aluminium
Front: 14M/C x MT3.50, 5 spoke cast aluminium
Brakes
Front Disc Combined Braking System 220mm hydraulic disc with combined 2 piston caliper
Rear Disc Combined Braking System 130mm drum
Suspension
Front -- 31mm telescopic fork, 89mm axle travel
Rear -- Twin suspension aluminium swingarm, 95mm axle travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Pearl Jasmine White
Pearl Jupiter Grey
Matte Galaxy Black Metallic
Matte Suit Blue Metallic


Physical Specs
Length 1910 mm 1935 mm
Width 670 mm --
Height -- 1105 mm
Weight 115 kg 740 kg
Kerb Weight -- 130
Seat Height 789 764
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1315 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.2 litres 8.1 litres
Overview
About -- The Honda 2023 PCX 125 features a tubular steel duplex frame and a 125 cc single-cylinder engin Read More
Features -- - Smart Key
- 30.4L Under Seat storage space
- USB Type C Socket in the Glovebox
- Honda Selectable Torque Control (HSTC)
Additional Details Max laden mass : 265 kg
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 101 mpg
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4743