AJS Isaba vs Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Compare Specifications of AJS Isaba and Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Selected Bikes

AJS Isaba
AJS Isaba

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 TE 150
Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 143.99 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, air cooled, single cylinder 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Kick and electric starter
Clutch -- DS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection - Rongmao YB05
Fuel type : Unleaded or E5 petrol
--
Maximum Power 11 Ps @ 9500 rpm --
Maximum Torque 9 Nm @ 8000 rpm --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission Five speed, chain drive 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Top Speed 97 kmph --
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Sprocket Front sprocket : 14T 428
Rear sprocket : 48T 428
--
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 --
Rear 120/70-17 --
Wheel / RIM Rim size : Front : 2.50 x 17 - Rear : 3.50 x 17 Spoke
Brakes
Front Single disc Combined Braking System
280 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minimum
Disc brake 260 mm
Rear Single disc Combined Braking System
240 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minimum
Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear -- WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Royal Blue
Black
Grey
--


Physical Specs
Length 1985 mm --
Width 745 mm --
Height 1075 mm --
Weight 136 kg 99.6 kg
Seat Height 760 950
Wheelbase 1360 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features -- - Ultra lightweight punch
- Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- CNC machined triple clamp
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
Additional Details Max laden mass : 276 kg
Max load : 140 kg
Gear ratios :
Gear 1 - 35.394
Gear 2 - 21.910
Gear 3 - 16.140
Gear 4 - 12.920
Gear 5 - 10.771
Maximum hill starting ability fully laden : 15%
Turning angle : left/right 40 deg
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 104 mpg
EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4053