AKT Motos TT 250 Adventour Fi vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Compare Specifications of AKT Motos TT 250 Adventour Fi and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Selected Bikes

AKT Motos TT 250 Adventour Fi
AKT Motos TT 250 Adventour Fi

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.60 cc 296.00 cc
Engine 4T, liquid-cooled 4-valve single cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System EFI Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 25.48 HP @ 9000 RPM 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque 23 NM @ 7000 RPM 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Transmission 6 manual gearbox 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Headlamp Bifocal streetlight, stop and LED directional --
Tyres
Front 110 / 80-19 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear 130 / 70-17 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front ABS Disc Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear ABS Disc Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
Suspension
Front Inverted bar telescopic 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Unishock Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Matte Black
Glossy White
Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2125 mm 2170 mm
Width 885 mm 860 mm
Height 1370 mm 1390 mm
Kerb Weight -- 175
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1450 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features - USB Port - Topcase System 30 Litres
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3238