Ares Aplus vs Co-Motion Cascadia

Compare Specifications of Aplus and Co-Motion Cascadia

Selected Bikes

Ares Aplus
Ares Aplus

Brand:

Model:

Co-Motion Cascadia
Co-Motion Cascadia

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame -- Co-Motion-designed Reynolds 725 heat treated double butted Cro-Moly tubing
Stem Top Road Stem 40mm --
Handle Bar Rise 200mm, Width 680mm, Back Sweep 6 Degree --
Fork APLUS Zero Fork(HI TEN) Co-Motion taper-gauge Cro-Moly with CNC steerer
Seats 198x118mm Black --
Seatpost 25.4x200mm Include with Seat --
Grip Black Grip --
Crankset Cr-mo 3pcs Crank 160mm --
Pedals Plastic Pedal --
Chain KMC Z410A NP/BR --
Shifters -- Shimano Ultegra R8000 11-speed
Saddle -- Co-Motion 27.2 / Selle Italia XR Flow
Headset -- Chris King NoThreadset 1 1/8"
Derailleur Front -- Shimano Ultegra R8000 11-speed
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Ultegra R8000 11-speed
Hub Front 36H Alloy Lose Ball 10mm --
Hub Rear ARESBIKES 9T Freecoaster 36H 10mm --
Spoke 14 Stainless, Black --
Sprocket Steel Ring 25T --
Bottom Bracket Sealed Bearing, Spanish BB --
Tyres
Front ARESBIKES A-Class 20 × 1.90 Schwalbe Marathon GT 700 x 35 mm
Rear ARESBIKES A-Class 20 × 1.90 Schwalbe Marathon GT 700 x 35 mm
Wheel / RIM Cycle Star Black 36H Rims Hand built with DT 350 Disc hubs / Astral Outback rims
Brakes
Front Tektro 907A U-Brake TRP Spyre 160 mm Disc
Rear Tektro 907A U-Brake TRP Spyre 160 mm Disc
Brake Lever Tektro 289A Brake Lever --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Mat Black
G.Purple
G.Navy
G.White
M.Gray
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 11.2 kg --
Overview
Features -- - Proven Co-Motion touring geometry
- Rack/ fender mounts and three bottle mounts
- Light and Tough exclusive Reynolds 725 tubing
Additional Details Top Tube Length : 470mm(18.5″)
Rear Center : 317mm(12.5″)
Head Angle : 75 Degree
Seat Angle : 72 Degree
Rear End size : 10mm(3/8″)
Drivetrain : FSA Energy 46/30t 11-spd / 11-34t cassettee
Cockpit : FSA Gossamer stem / Omega compact handlebar

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9061