Ariel Rider C-Class Electric Commuter Bike vs RKS MC3

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Ariel Rider C-Class Electric Commuter Bike vs RKS MC3

Compare Specifications of Ariel Rider C-Class Electric Commuter Bike and RKS MC3

Selected Bikes

Ariel Rider C-Class Electric Commuter Bike Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

RKS MC3 Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Electric	Electric
Motor	500W Mid-Drive Motor	RKS 36V 250W
Range	104 Km per Charge	35-40 km
Charging Time	--	3 - 4 Hours
Engine Starting	Electric	--
Load Carrying Capacity	--	Max Weight : 124 Kg
Top Speed	--	25 kmph
Battery	48V 12Ah Lithium-ion Battery	36V 7.8Ah
Display	Full LCD display	LCD S866
Frame	--	20” Steel C-T16.5” Folding
Stem	Easy-Adjustable Stem	--
Fork	Suntour Suspension Fork	Steel Rigid 20”
Seatpost	Suspension Seat Post	--
Crankset	--	GS-S121
Chain	--	M50
Shifters	--	Shimano ASLTX30R7AT
Saddle	--	Comfortable
Derailleur Rear	--	Shimano ARD-TY300D 7SP
Hub Front	7-Speed Shimano Nexus Internal Gear Hub	--
Hub Rear	7-Speed Shimano Nexus Internal Gear Hub	--
Headlamp	LED	36V Controled By Display
Taillamp	LED	Plastic LED

Tyres

Front	CST 26" x 2.15" tires with reflective sidewalls	Kenda 20”
Rear	CST 26" x 2.15" tires with reflective sidewalls	Kenda 20”
Wheel / RIM	--	20” Spoke

Brakes

Front	Tektro Hydraulic Disc Brake	YX-DB06 Disc
Rear	Tektro Hydraulic Disc Brake	YX-DB06 Disc

Suspension

Front	Front suspension fork with 80 mm of travel	--
Rear	--	--

Colors Available

Colors

Blue Pearl White

White Black Orange

Physical Specs

Length	--	--
Weight	--	24 kg

Overview

Features	- USB Charger - Gear Shifting Sensor - Suspension Seat Post - Easy-Adjustable Stem - Low Mid-Bar	--
Additional Details	Total payload capacity: 145 Kg Integrated rear rack capacity: 27.2 kg	Fender : Steel Freewheel : Shimano MFTZ500 7SP Electronic Cable : Waterproof Harness

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

3684