Batch Fitness Bike vs Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Batch Fitness Bike vs Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap

Compare Specifications of Batch Fitness Bike and Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap

Selected Bikes

Batch Fitness Bike Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Frame	6061 Alloy Sizes : S, M, L	Kestrel Super Light (KSL) 800K high-modulus carbon fiber, PF30 BB
Stem	3D forged alloy	Kestrel KSL Aero Carbon
Handle Bar	6061 aluminum, 31.8mm D, 660mm x 25mm rise, 10 degree sweep	Oval Concepts 970 Jet Stream full-integrated carbon w/ ski-bend carbon extensions
Fork	1-1/8" rigid hi-tensile steel	KSL AERO Pro SL TT full-carbon, 1 1/8" steerer
Seats	Batch anatomical	--
Seatpost	Alloy micro-adjust, 27.2mm	--
Crankset	3-pc Alloy | Small and Medium: 170mm | and Large: 175 mm	SRAM Red, 52/36T
Chain	KMC Z7	SRAM Red 22, 11-speed
Shifters	Shimano EF-500 21sp	SRAM RED eTAP for TT/Tri, 11-speed
Saddle	--	Prologo TGALE TRI, titanium rails w/ U-Cage
Headset	Threadless	FSA CX integrated 1 1/8" top, 1 1/8" bottom w/ 10 mm top cover
Derailleur Front	--	SRAM RED eTAP, braze-on
Derailleur Rear	Shimano TY-300	SRAM RED eTAP, 11-speed
Hub Front	Steel 32H	--
Hub Rear	Steel 32H	--
Cassette	Shimano 14-28T 7sp	SRAM RED 22, 11-28T, 11-speed
Bottom Bracket	Sealed cartridge bearing	SRAM PF30

Tyres

Front	700c x 35 mm	ZIPP Tangente Speed CL, 700 x 23c, folding
Rear	700c x 35 mm	ZIPP Tangente Speed CL, 700 x 23c, folding
Wheel / RIM	Rims : Double-wall Alloy	Oval Concepts 985 Tubeless, 700c 16/20H aero carbon rims

Brakes

Front	Alloy Linear Pull	--
Rear	Alloy Linear Pull	--
Brake Lever	--	SRAM BL900 for TT/Tri

Suspension

Front	--	--
Rear	--	--

Colors Available

Colors

Gloss Fern Green Gloss Batch Blue Gloss Moss Yellow Matte Pitch Black

Satin Red Orange

Physical Specs

Length	--	--
Weight	--	8.72 kg

Overview

Features	--	--
Additional Details	--	Sizes : 50cm, 52.5cm, 55cm, 57.5cm, 59.5cm

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

873