Benda Fox 300 vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Compare Specifications of Benda Fox 300 and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Selected Bikes

Benda Fox 300
Benda Fox 300

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Motor 4T --
Engine Displacement 300.00 cc 296.00 cc
Engine 2 cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Electronic injection Delphi Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Ignition CDI --
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Transmission Gears / Chain 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery 12V 7Ah --
Display Digital Display --
Gear 6 gears --
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear -- 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Double lobed disc ABS radial anchoring Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear Double lobed disc ABS radial anchoring Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
Suspension
Front Inverted fork 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Double shock absorber Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Black
Red
Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length -- 2170 mm
Width -- 860 mm
Height -- 1390 mm
Kerb Weight -- 175
Wheelbase -- 1450 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Topcase System 30 Litres
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6473