Benelli 302S vs Big Boy Voge 300AC

Compare Specifications of Benelli 302S and Big Boy Voge 300AC

Selected Bikes

Benelli 302S
Benelli 302S

Brand:

Model:

Big Boy Voge 300AC
Big Boy Voge 300AC

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 300.00 cc 292.40 cc
Engine 2-cylinder/4-stroke/8-valve Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, Liquid-Cooled
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-plate type --
Fuel System Electronic injection with twin ø 38 mm throttle bodies --
Ignition TLI --
Maximum Power 37.5 PS @ 11000 RPM 29 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 25.6 NM @ 9000 RPM 25 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 150kg
Transmission -- 6-speed
Top Speed -- 130 kmph
Battery -- 12V 7AH
Display -- Digital Display
Frame Steel trestle in steel tubes --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 29.4 kmpl
Tyres
Front 120/70-ZR17 110/70-17 Tubeless
Rear 160/60 - ZR17 150/60-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alluminium alloy --
Brakes
Front Double floating disks ø260 mm with 4 pistons caliper and ABS Disc
Rear Single disc ø240 mm with floating calliper single piston and ABS Disc
Suspension
Front ø 41 mm upside down forks --
Rear Rear swing arm with lateral shock absorber with extension hydraulic brake and spring preload adjustment --
Colors Available
Colors White
Red
Green
Black
--


Physical Specs
Length 2130 mm 2025 mm
Width 800 mm 790 mm
Height 1120 mm 1090 mm
Weight -- 150 kg
Kerb Weight 185 --
Seat Height 795 795
Wheelbase 1410 mm 1360 mm
Ground Clearance 175 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - FUTURISTIC HEADLIGHT
- ASYMMETRIC LCD INSTRUMENTATION
- BEST-IN-CLASS ABS BRAKES
--
Additional Details EXHAUST SYSTEM : With catalytic converter and oxygen sensors
CERTIFICATION : Euro 4
SPARK PLUG : NGK CR8E
FUEL CONSUMPTION : 4.3 l / 100 km
CO2 EMISSIONS : 99 g/km
FRONT RIM DIMENSIONS : 17” x MT 3.50” DOT
REAR RIM DIMENSIONS : 17” x MT 4,50” DOT
FRONT SUSPENSION STROKE : 135 mm
REAR SHOCK ABSORBER STROKE : 46 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

484