Beta 2024 500 RS vs Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Compare Specifications of Beta 2024 500 RS and Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Selected Bikes

Beta 2024 500 RS
Beta 2024 500 RS

Brand:

Model:

Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary
Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 477.50 cc 449.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 –stroke, liquid cooled, 4-valve (Titanium intake and steel exhaust), cooling fan, electric start. (back up kick starter as an option) Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled , Single camshaft - 4 valve
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication Twin Oil Pumps w/ Cartridge Filter & Separate Compartments For Engine & Transmission --
Clutch Wet Diaphragm-style --
Fuel System 42mm Throttle Body w/ Dual Injectors Electronic Fuel injection - throttle body ø 40mm
Ignition Dual-Map Kokusan 200w output --
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power -- 40 HP @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 43 NM @ 6000 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed --
Frame Molybdenum steel / Double Cradle w/ quick air filter access --
Tyres
Front DOT Maxxis Enduro 110/80 R19
Rear DOT Maxxis Enduro 140/80 R17
Wheel / RIM -- Spoked with aluminum rims
Brakes
Front 260 mm floating rotor Floating brake disc 320 mm
Rear 240 mm rotor Floating brake disc 230mm
Suspension
Front 48 mm Sachs Open Cartridge with compression, rebound & Ignition spring preload adjustment Rebound damping regulation
Front suspension travel: 150mm
Rear Aluminum Body Sachs shock w/ adjustable rebound and hi/low speed compression Rebound damping regulation
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2080 mm
Weight -- 150 kg
Kerb Weight 110 --
Seat Height 940 820
Wheelbase 1491 mm 1425 mm
Ground Clearance 320 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres `12 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Exhaust system : Dual exhaust by ARROW
Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission: 97 g/km
Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5705